![]() |
| |||||||
| JustBreastImplants.com | Locate a Surgeon | Photo Gallery | Risks | Size Info | Consult Info | Breast Implants | Incision Placement | Rules/Etiquette |
| Register | Invite Your Friends | All Albums | FAQ | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Ask Dr. Bahram Ghaderi (Illinois) In this forum, you can ask Dr. Bahram Ghaderi, Chicago, Illinois plastic surgeon, questions about breast augmentation and other plastic surgery procedures. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,047
Thanks: 404
Thanked 354 Times in 301 Posts
![]() |
Welcome Dr. Ghaderi. Thanks for your participation in JBI. It seems that I've read that cogels are firmer that traditional/ non cohesive silicone implants. Pre breast augmentation I held a saline implant and a traditional silicone implant. While I saw a photo of the cogel, I've never held the implant outside of my body. Do you use cogels in your practice? If so, have you found them to be firmer?
__________________ Phenomom 5'4" 130 lbs breast augmentation: 02/12/07 Mentor HPs 325 CC Silicone Unders Crease Incision |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Administrator ![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,314
Thanks: 2,209
Thanked 2,958 Times in 1,171 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm not Dr. Ghaderi, but I have a question for you. Are you referring to "gummy bear" breast implants (the semi-solid implants)? I ask this because ALL silicone implants are cohesive now. The difference is that the gummy bear implants are firmer b/c it's an actual semi-solid). In the US, the only gummy implants available are thru studies. And the gummies are only available (in the US) in anatomical shape, textured surface.
|
| | |
| | #3 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,047
Thanks: 404
Thanked 354 Times in 301 Posts
![]() |
Hi Nikki, I have Mentor HP MemoryGel. As seen on this web site http://www.mentorcorp.com/breastsurg...tion/index.htm
__________________ Phenomom 5'4" 130 lbs breast augmentation: 02/12/07 Mentor HPs 325 CC Silicone Unders Crease Incision |
| | |
| | #4 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,002
Thanks: 546
Thanked 923 Times in 579 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm just wondering why your PS would have "traditional" silicone implants with liquid silicone even available for touching at their practice. Liquid silicone hasn't been used (in the western world) since the 70s. So it must've been a really old implant! The "traditional" implants have been cohesive since the 80s. So I would really think the implant you held in your hand was cohesive as well.
|
| | |
| | #5 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,002
Thanks: 546
Thanked 923 Times in 579 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | viscous liquid = cohesive. That is not liquid. Cohesive implants can range from almost liquid to semisolid, but they are most definitely cohesive these days. Look up the definition of liquid in the dictionary if you have to.
|
| | |
| | #6 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,002
Thanks: 546
Thanked 923 Times in 579 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Regular cohesive gels that are used these days are not form retaining either. If a cohesive gel implant ruptures you can still get extracapsular (out of pocket) gel bleeds. But it will remain within the breast area while with the old liquid silicones it might travel up against your spine for example making a ruptured implant very difficult to remove entirely. The gummy bear implants on the other hand are completely form retaining and will stick together if cut open (they're not on the market in the US yet, only available through studies). Which is why Nikki is asking whether the OP meant gummy bears vs. regular cohesives or cohesives vs. the old liquid ones. |
| | |
| | #7 | |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: New York, New York
Posts: 1,297
Thanks: 112
Thanked 617 Times in 473 Posts
![]() ![]() | Quote:
Last edited by Admin; 10-30-2008 at 11:22 PM. | |
| | |
| | #8 | |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,002
Thanks: 546
Thanked 923 Times in 579 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
Tiffany, actually the manufacturers don't use the term Memory Gel, that is a tradermarked name used by the Mentor corporation. Their gummybear implants are also made of their trademarked Memory Gel, only at a different degree of firmness (as Mentor has three different grades for their Memory Gel implants, 1 being the softest, 2 in the middle and 3 being the gummybear consistency). | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Administrator ![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,314
Thanks: 2,209
Thanked 2,958 Times in 1,171 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have Mentor silicone too. They've been cohesive, but they weren't marketed as "cohesive" until a few years ago. ALL silicone implants are cohesive (except for the pretty old implants).
|
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Administrator ![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,314
Thanks: 2,209
Thanked 2,958 Times in 1,171 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
I'm sure you've felt of that greasy-feeling Dow implant Dr. DeWire has in his office. That's the "old" silicone (much less viscous, and a LOT more watery/runny). | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Administrator ![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,314
Thanks: 2,209
Thanked 2,958 Times in 1,171 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Actually, even the Mentor HP's aren't gummy bear implants. They're just more cohesive then the mod hps and the regular mods. There aren't any gummy bear implants that are FDA approved right now. Plus, the gummies are all textured anatomical implants. Mentor and McGhan (which is now Inamed/Allergan) had studies for them. http://www.justbreastimplants.com/im..._gel_study.htm and http://www.justbreastimplants.com/im...mentor_cpg.htm are links to those studies and implants. From the Mentor website at http://www.mentorcorp.com/global/phy...gel-myths.htm: Let's clear up the "cohesion confusion" that is prevalent today. Simply put, all Mentor silicone gel implants are cohesive polymers, not liquids. This means that the gel filler acts as a solid unit rather than a liquid. Our gels hold together uniformly, while retaining the natural "give" that resembles actual breast tissue. The word “cohesive” is a new term being used today to describe the nature of the fill compared to the more liquid fill that may have been used in silicone implants in the early 1970’s. This is not new science, this is not new technology – cohesive is simply a word that’s being used today to describe the “sticking together” nature of the gel. All of Mentor silicone gel-filled breast implants are all cohesive, all the time. The inside of Mentor's gel implants is filled with our proprietary Memory Gel™. It is our own cohesive gel formulation that makes sure the gel acts as a unit rather than a liquid - it holds together uniformly and retains the natural give that resembles actual breast tissue. It also helps prevent migration, or running, of the gel in the event of a rupture. We have been using this type of gel since 1985. Cohesive I - The standard cohesive level gel used in Mentor's implants. This is Mentor's softest gel and has been preferred in Round Moderate, Moderate Plus, and High Profile and Round Becker expander/implants. Cohesive II - A slighly firmer gel, for surgeons wanting a firmer feeling implant. This gell is used in Round MOderate, Moderate Plus, and High Profile implants, as well as Contour Profile Becker expander/implants. Cohesive III - Mentor's most cohesive gel, providing shape retention with a pleasing level of firmness for optimal aesthetic results. [B]This gel is used in Mentor's Conour Profile gel implant family. In other words, unless you're in a study for the McGhan 410 Cohesil implants, or the Mentor CPG implants, you don't have gummy bear implants. (I'm referring to people in the US.) |
| | |
| | #12 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: New York, New York
Posts: 1,297
Thanks: 112
Thanked 617 Times in 473 Posts
![]() ![]() | Isn't Mentor an implant manufacturer? I don't get it.
Last edited by Admin; 10-30-2008 at 11:22 PM. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Administrator ![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,314
Thanks: 2,209
Thanked 2,958 Times in 1,171 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Yes, they are. I think that's what Ina was trying to say. Implant manufacturers don't use it. Only Mentor.
|
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Admin For This Useful Post: |
| | #14 |
| Certified by the ABPS ![]() Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Saint Charles, Illinois
Posts: 70
Thanks: 0
Thanked 31 Times in 23 Posts
![]() |
The cohesive gels are the one approved for use by the FDA last November. The "gummy bear" implants are only available through a study. I have not used one yet as I have been very happy with the cohesive gels. I think the more solid implants will have a more significant role for breast reconstruction. The softer feel of the cohesive gels is more beneficial for breast augmentation.
|
| | |
| | #15 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 159
Thanks: 36
Thanked 71 Times in 52 Posts
![]() | Quote:
![]() I have mentor memory gel implants and I am participating in the 10 year study..it doesn't say "CPG" on it anywhere...what the heck do I have?? | |
| | |
| | #16 | |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Transplanted to Sunny San Diego, California
Posts: 372
Thanks: 75
Thanked 166 Times in 139 Posts
![]() | Quote:
Don't worry, I was confused by it all when my ps first mentioned using silicone with me... Mesha
__________________ | |
| | |
| | #17 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 159
Thanks: 36
Thanked 71 Times in 52 Posts
![]() | Quote:
Ok, The thing I have says post approval study so then they are not "gummy bears". So how do I know if I have cohesive I or cohesive II? I guess I should have known this before and asked...All I know is that I got to play with one and I loved the way it felt, so that's what I got. | |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Administrator ![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,314
Thanks: 2,209
Thanked 2,958 Times in 1,171 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ditto what Mesha said. The difference NOW is that you don't HAVE to participate in the study in order to get implants. I had a redo in June and switched back to silicone, but I'm not in the post-approval study. Prior to the FDA approving implants last year, there were certain requirements that had to be met in order to get silicone. If you met those requirements, you were entered into a study. I hope this makes sense. |
| | |
| | #19 | |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,002
Thanks: 546
Thanked 923 Times in 579 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
Regarding the gummy bears, since they are completely form retaining all gummy bear implants are TEXTURED ANATOMICAL. So when you see someone talking about gummy bears and rounds they've just gotten the terms mixed up! | |
| | |
| | #20 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: New York, New York
Posts: 1,297
Thanks: 112
Thanked 617 Times in 473 Posts
![]() ![]() | I read that ROUND gummybear implants are available in the U.K. I don't know what company makes them. I have a theory that those are what Victoria Beckham has...
Last edited by Admin; 10-30-2008 at 11:22 PM. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| saline vs silicone...asymetrical | midwestern | General Breast Augmentation Discussion | 11 | 04-15-2008 11:20 AM |
| Fake boobs don't float | 32AAgyrl | General Breast Augmentation Discussion | 29 | 11-23-2007 07:22 PM |
| Weight of silicone be a problem? | TheScientist | Ask Dr. Sorokin (New Jersey) | 4 | 11-11-2007 01:00 PM |
| Saline or silicone? | WWK | CC Amount / Size | 12 | 10-29-2007 05:22 PM |
| Do silicone overs fluff? | Hathawtn | Breast Augmentation Surgery Post-Op & Recovery Forum | 4 | 10-10-2007 02:40 PM |