Do you consider your BA "reconstructive" or cosmetic?

MissKitten · 05-05-2009, 05:25 AM

Kind of both.

I had tuberous breasts that had to be reconstructed in order for me to get implants

tetitas · 05-05-2009, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KayisforKisses

Mine is cosmetic. Nature didn't think I needed boobs, but I disagreed

I loved that quote! Sums it up perfectly!

Although I did have some assymetry to fix, the size was purely cosmetic. Especially now that boobie greed has hit!

Meesh1986 · 05-05-2009, 12:55 PM

I consider mine to be cosmetic, because I had great breasts before. I was a large B, small C. They just werent big enough for my tall frame!!

AYOOITZLILMO · 05-05-2009, 01:38 PM

I think reconstructive because I lost 45lbs four years ago and my boobs are saggy. I need something to fix them. The doctor diagnosed with tuberous breast deformity because of that.

beckybee · 05-06-2009, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chickie32

reconstructive by definition is when something is built *after* it was taken away, such as a masectomy

so w/that said, and while BA's were first done on cancer patients and masectomy patients, all others are then considered 'purely cosmetic'

hth!

I understand that completely...that's why I used the two categories "reconstructive" and "reconstructive to me"...to get a personal versus factual perspective. Hope that makes sense.

hw9907 · 05-07-2009, 02:56 PM

I voted cosmetic. i mainly wanted them bigger.

Mafresita · 07-08-2009, 11:58 PM

i consider it cosmetic unless having them too small is considered a deformity xD

happyturtle · 07-09-2009, 03:44 AM

Well, there is sag and I did lose some volume to the sag, but really, I voted cosmetic cause there isn't anything "wrong" with them, I just don't like them- but that will change very soon- hurray!

IGotQuestions · 08-01-2009, 11:42 PM

mine was technically reconstructive. they were tuberous, asymmetric, and i had a scar in the way of the growth. whatever, everyone deserves to have happy boobies, right?

IGotQuestions · 08-01-2009, 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chickie32

reconstructive by definition is when something is built *after* it was taken away, such as a masectomy

so w/that said, and while BA's were first done on cancer patients and masectomy patients, all others are then considered 'purely cosmetic'

hth!

well, mine didn't have the chance to get taken away. i was born with a hole in my heart and as part of the open heart surgery they had to put an emergency drainage tube right through my breast tissue so when i was supposed to grow breasts, there was scar tissue in the way, so i didn't. maybe its not "reconstructive," but just "constructive" either way, in my case i don't think mine was "purely cosmetic." but i get the context of what you're saying. i guess the proper answer for me isn't an option on the poll. lol

Dare · 08-04-2009, 06:11 PM

One look at my pitiful, nursed-out, deflated, droopy, formerly glorious, natural 32DD's-turned hideous, droopy, post-babies 32C's BEFORES and you'd know the answer. I absolutely consider it reconstruction.

2newones · 08-04-2009, 08:35 PM

No question reconstructive for me. 35 of the last 36 years spent with capsular constriction (hard boobs!) and the last 5 with ruptures is what qualifies the BA as reconstructive. But there's a cosmetic part too, going bigger and of course being soft again (I can't even remember what that's like) is so exciting!

Finding Boobies · 08-04-2009, 09:29 PM

I understand it is cosmetic although to me it is reconstructive. I feel deformed since having my babies

and it affects me physically and mentally.

Rosebud11 · 08-04-2009, 11:13 PM

I answered cosmetic, even though I did have asymmetry and wanted it correcte, but since I work in the medical field, I know that anything not medically necessary is considered cosmetic. This is why BA's are not covered under insurance for anyone except breast cancer patients, because you can live with asymmetry, saggy boobs, deflated boobs, etc. without any harm coming to you...so it is cosmetic.

TimeFlies · 10-13-2009, 10:40 PM

Cosmetic for me....I actually had cute boobs just tiny ones. I've wanted big ones forever.

finallyready · 10-14-2009, 10:41 PM

i am very tuberous and it looks awful, so mine is reconstructive.

morgan90211 · 10-14-2009, 11:10 PM

I chose cosmetic

QueenB · 10-15-2009, 12:52 AM

I didn't vote. I consider mine reconstructive and cosmetic as I had BA/BL. They were not symetrical what so ever and very saggy. (Monkey tits as my daughter once told me). LOL!

mai52takn · 10-15-2009, 01:40 AM

Reconstructive.

This is only because I was full and perky. This is prior to nursing two children, and loosing weight after my second child. After this I lost volume, shape and height.

So I reconstructed them back to they way they use to be!

Pinki · 10-15-2009, 07:24 AM

i answered reconstructive to me. my pre BA boobies were not those of a 21 year old with no babies. the drastic weightloss really took a toll on me

i would've been fine with even a B cup had they been perky but the bigger size was necessary to give me a lift without full anchor and to even out my pre-existing stretch marks...now i lurv the size

View Poll Results: Do you consider your BA cosmetic or reconstructive?
Cosmetic	133	58.59%
Reconstructive	27	11.89%
Reconstructive To Me	67	29.52%
Voters: 227. You may not vote on this poll

05-05-2009, 12:55 PM	#43
Meesh1986 LoVe mY BoObIeS Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: draper, utah Posts: 190 Thanks: 131 Thanked 94 Times in 85 Posts	I consider mine to be cosmetic, because I had great breasts before. I was a large B, small C. They just werent big enough for my tall frame!! __________________ stats 800ccs-Silicone-Under Pre BA 34B Post BA 36G/H!!

05-05-2009, 01:38 PM	#44
AYOOITZLILMO Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: STATEN ISLAND, NEW YORK Posts: 295 Thanks: 44 Thanked 59 Times in 58 Posts	I think reconstructive because I lost 45lbs four years ago and my boobs are saggy. I need something to fix them. The doctor diagnosed with tuberous breast deformity because of that. __________________ Height: 4'11" Weight: 110lbs RC: 31 Pre-BA: Saggy 34B Post BA: 32E 275 CC's Mentor Moderate Plus Cohesive Silicone Inframammory Fold Lollipop Lift Completely Under the Muscle Full Tummy Tuck http://www.justbreastimplants.com/Walden/

05-07-2009, 02:56 PM	#46
hw9907 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: monterey california Posts: 176 Thanks: 33 Thanked 43 Times in 43 Posts	I voted cosmetic. i mainly wanted them bigger. __________________ Mother of 2 5'3" 130 lbs Pre 34 Full B small C 1st BA 34 DDD/34F 500cc's saline, under 2nd BA 32H/34G 820cc's saline, under

07-08-2009, 11:58 PM	#47
Mafresita Boobiees! Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico Posts: 54 Thanks: 4 Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts	i consider it cosmetic unless having them too small is considered a deformity xD __________________ Age: 21 Height: 5'3"/162 cm Weight: 128 lbs/59 kg Rib cage: 29" BA date: June 26th 2009 410cc Silicone/overs/periareolar Pre-op: small 34B Post-op: hopefully full C/small D

05-05-2009, 05:25 AM	#41
MissKitten Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: So Cal Posts: 187 Thanks: 31 Thanked 58 Times in 55 Posts	Kind of both. I had tuberous breasts that had to be reconstructed in order for me to get implants

07-09-2009, 03:44 AM	#48
happyturtle Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Lake Tahoe Area Posts: 119 Thanks: 124 Thanked 36 Times in 31 Posts	Well, there is sag and I did lose some volume to the sag, but really, I voted cosmetic cause there isn't anything "wrong" with them, I just don't like them- but that will change very soon- hurray!

08-01-2009, 11:42 PM	#49
IGotQuestions they're heeeeeeeeeeeeeere!!! Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: san diego, CA Posts: 48 Thanks: 13 Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts	mine was technically reconstructive. they were tuberous, asymmetric, and i had a scar in the way of the growth. whatever, everyone deserves to have happy boobies, right? __________________

08-04-2009, 06:11 PM	#51
Dare Knowledge is Power Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 1,372 Thanks: 478 Thanked 830 Times in 587 Posts	One look at my pitiful, nursed-out, deflated, droopy, formerly glorious, natural 32DD's-turned hideous, droopy, post-babies 32C's BEFORES and you'd know the answer. I absolutely consider it reconstruction.

08-04-2009, 08:35 PM	#52
2newones Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: NJ Posts: 94 Thanks: 22 Thanked 35 Times in 25 Posts	No question reconstructive for me. 35 of the last 36 years spent with capsular constriction (hard boobs!) and the last 5 with ruptures is what qualifies the BA as reconstructive. But there's a cosmetic part too, going bigger and of course being soft again (I can't even remember what that's like) is so exciting! __________________ 5' 5 1/2" 108 lbs 27" ribcage Pre BA-small 32D, implants were 36 years old Silicone, 450cc Mod+, Aug 11th, 2009--Post BA 30F/32DDD

08-04-2009, 09:29 PM	#53
Finding Boobies Getting my BA 2009/2010 Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 105 Thanks: 8 Thanked 22 Times in 19 Posts	I understand it is cosmetic although to me it is reconstructive. I feel deformed since having my babies and it affects me physically and mentally. __________________ Getting my BA 2009/2010, getting back what God formely gave me ;)

08-04-2009, 11:13 PM	#54
Rosebud11 Will my lefty ever look like my righty??? Join Date: May 2009 Location: Phoenix, Arizona Posts: 571 Thanks: 120 Thanked 253 Times in 198 Posts	I answered cosmetic, even though I did have asymmetry and wanted it correcte, but since I work in the medical field, I know that anything not medically necessary is considered cosmetic. This is why BA's are not covered under insurance for anyone except breast cancer patients, because you can live with asymmetry, saggy boobs, deflated boobs, etc. without any harm coming to you...so it is cosmetic. __________________ Pre BA - asymmetrical 36 B (but I think I was wearing the wrong band size...maybe should have been a 34 - my ribcage is 29") Post BA - 400 and 450 cc's; high profile; under muscle;areola incision; Mentor Memory Gel Silicone; Post BA Size - 34DD www.justbreastimplants.com/Cohen/

10-13-2009, 10:40 PM	#55
TimeFlies Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Brookfield, Wisconsin Posts: 105 Thanks: 148 Thanked 57 Times in 44 Posts	Cosmetic for me....I actually had cute boobs just tiny ones. I've wanted big ones forever. __________________ 5ft 118lbs 32y/o Pre BA 34B Post BA 34D BA October 7, 2009 Mentor Silicone Gels 375cc's

10-14-2009, 10:41 PM	#56
finallyready Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: New York Posts: 32 Thanks: 18 Thanked 9 Times in 5 Posts	i am very tuberous and it looks awful, so mine is reconstructive. __________________ Looking to get a BA and fix my tuberous condition early 2010. 38. no kids. 34A/B ish, 110lbs. Thinking 225-275CC's for a C-/C.

10-14-2009, 11:10 PM	#57
morgan90211 Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: LOS ANGELES Posts: 82 Thanks: 10 Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts	I chose cosmetic __________________ Morgan 5'-9" - 135 lbs. Getting my Boobies from Dr. Rey - Dr. 90210 November 2, 2009 600 cc High Profile Silicone Starting with a 34 A SO EXCITED!

10-15-2009, 12:52 AM	#58
QueenB Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Sierra Vista, Arizona Posts: 46 Thanks: 9 Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts	I didn't vote. I consider mine reconstructive and cosmetic as I had BA/BL. They were not symetrical what so ever and very saggy. (Monkey tits as my daughter once told me). LOL!

10-15-2009, 01:40 AM	#59
mai52takn ~Weapons of Mass Distraction~ Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Southern California Posts: 518 Thanks: 103 Thanked 234 Times in 195 Posts	Reconstructive. This is only because I was full and perky. This is prior to nursing two children, and loosing weight after my second child. After this I lost volume, shape and height. So I reconstructed them back to they way they use to be! __________________ Will only accept friend requests from active users, with pics & posts.

10-15-2009, 07:24 AM	#60
Pinki Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 167 Thanks: 37 Thanked 59 Times in 58 Posts	i answered reconstructive to me. my pre BA boobies were not those of a 21 year old with no babies. the drastic weightloss really took a toll on me i would've been fine with even a B cup had they been perky but the bigger size was necessary to give me a lift without full anchor and to even out my pre-existing stretch marks...now i lurv the size __________________ 5'3 110lbs Pre BA:saggy 32B Post BA:so far full 32DD? Implants:405cc HP textured silicone Placement:unders Incision:periareolar *For privacy reasons, i will ONLY accept friend requests if you have posts AND pictures*

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Premier Center for Cosmetic surgery	Tapioka_pudding	Plastic Surgeons	5	03-13-2009 01:26 PM
Plastic vs. Cosmetic Surgeons	lilhokie	General Breast Augmentation Discussion	15	11-24-2008 02:45 PM
Cosmetic surgeon vs plastic surgeon?	Johanna_Topaz	Ask Dr. Kearney (California)	2	10-01-2008 08:24 PM
An interesting article on cosmetic surgery- BA/BL...	eve	General Breast Augmentation Discussion	13	09-19-2008 09:31 AM