Mentor Clinical Study of the Contour Profile Gel Mammary Prosthesis
Cohesive Silicone Gel Breast Implants
Objective:
Demonstrate safety and effectiveness of Mentor's Contour Profile Gel (CPG) Mammary Prosthesis in women who are undergoing primary augmentation, primary reconstruction, or revision.
Design:
-
Multicenter
-
Non-masked, open label
-
Two year data submitted to FDA as part of Pre-Market Application
-
Follwing FDA approval, follow up data collected: Rheumatic Disease Diagnosis, QoLs, silent rupture with MRI, and Adverse Events up to 10 years annually
Population:
Enrollment numbers by indication:
Augmentation: 570
Reconstruction: 190
Total number of Investigators: up to 60
Total number of surgical sites: up to 100
Study Device: Mentor Siltex ® Contour Profile Gel Mammary Prosthesis
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Subject is Genetic female and is at least 18 years old
-
A candidate for:
Primary breast augmentation (for general breast enlargement)
Primary breast reconstruction (for cancer, trauma, surgical loss of breast or congenital deformity)
Revision surgery (previous augmentation or reconstruction with silicone-filled or saline-filled implants)
Signs the Informed Consent
Agrees to return device to Mentor if explant necessary
Agrees to comply with follow-up procedures, including returning for all follow-up visits
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Subject is pregnant
-
Has nursed a child within three months of study enrollment
-
Been implanted with any silicone implant other than breast implants
-
Confirmed diagnosis of rheumatic disease
-
Currently has a condition that could compromise or complicate wound healing (except reconstruction subjects)
-
Subject in Augmentation cohort and has diagnosis of active cancer of any type, except low-grade non-metastasizing skin cancer
-
Infection or abscess anywhere in the body
-
Demonstrates tissue characteristics which are clinically incompatible with implant (e.g. tissue damage resulting from radiation, inadequate tissue, or compromised vascularity)
-
Possesses any condition, or is under treatment for any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator and/or consulting physicians(s), may constitute an unwarranted surgical risk.
-
Anatomic or physiologic abnormality which could lead to significant postoperative adverse events
-
Demonstrates characteristics that are unrealistic/unreasonable with the risks involved with the surgical procedure
-
Premalignant breast disease without a subcutaneous mastectomy.
-
Untreated or inappropriately treated breast malignancy, without mastectomy
-
Are HIV positive
-
Work for Mentor or the study doctor or are directly-related to anyone that works for Mentor or the study doctor
-
Implanted metal or metal devices, history of claustrophobia or other condition that would make a MRI scan prohibitive
Study Evaluation Schedule
Summary:
|
Data Collected |
Timeframe |
|
Baseline |
Operative |
10 weeks |
Annual
1 - 10 Years |
|
Subject Informed Consent |
X |
|
|
|
|
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria |
X |
|
|
|
|
Demo/History/Indication |
X |
|
|
|
|
Chest Measurements |
X |
|
X |
X |
|
Mammography (if performed) |
X |
|
X |
X |
|
Quality of Life A, B |
X |
|
|
X |
|
Nipple/Breast Sensitivity Assessment |
X |
|
X |
X |
|
Rheumatic Exam A |
X |
|
|
X |
|
Capsular Contracture |
|
|
X |
X |
|
Investigator Satisfaction with
ImplantE |
|
|
|
X |
|
Surgical Information |
|
X |
|
|
|
MRI Scan A,C |
|
|
|
X |
|
Adverse Events D |
|
X |
X |
X |
A At 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 years.
B Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale, SF-36, Body Esteem Scale, Breast Evaluation Questionnaire
C Required for randomly selected 400 of subjects
D Including secondary procedures and reimplantations upon occurrence, whether noted at a schedule or interim visit.
E At 1, 2, and 3 years.
Safety Endpoint:
Incidence, severity, method of resolution, and duration for all adverse events on a per implant and per subject basis
Effectiveness Endpoints:
Primary - Changes in chest circumference and bra and cup size (may not be applicable to reconstruction subjects)
Secondary - Changes in Quality of Life results
Photos of the Mentor Contour Profile Cohesive Silicone Gel Breast Implant



Related Links:
History of Cohesive Silicone Gel Breast Implants
Advantages and Disadvantages of Cohesive Gels
Cohesive Gel Breast Implants - General Info
Cohesive Silicone Gel FAQ
McGhan Cohesil Study Information for Cohesive Silicone Gel Breast
Implants